Overview of Confidence Intervals
- Confidence intervals are a frequentist concept
- Frequentists define a 95% confidence interval as an interval that contains the population parameter 95% of the time
- In other words, if we took 100 random samples of a population and construct 100 different 95% confidence intervals, then 95 of the 100 intervals will contain the population parameter
- The interval we just constructed is either in the 95% that do contain the interval, or the 5% that don't contain the interval
- The event is binary - it either is or is not in the interval - it's either a 0% or 100% of our population parameter being contained in the interval
-
For example, let's create an analogy about a game involving tossing a ring while aiming for a peg
- The tossed ring represents our confidence interval, and the peg represents our population parameter
- Confidence intervals are similar to the ring after it has been thrown at the peg
- The peg is either within the ring or not
Formula for Confidence Intervals
-
The confidence interval involves the following metrics:
- Standard Error: represents sampling error while accounting for the variable's standard deviation
- Margin of error: represents standard error with some additional room for error
- We typically define a confidence interval of a parameter as the following:
- For example, we could define a 95% confidence interval for a population mean as the following:
- Where our margin of error equals some critical value multiplied by our standard error
Overview of Credible Intervals
- Credible intervals are a bayesian concept
- Bayesians define a 95% credible interval as an interval with a 95% chance of containing the population parameter
- In other words, if we took 100 random samples of a population, then we can construct a single (credible) interval from the samples and say there is a 95% chance that the population parameter is within the interval
-
For example, let's return to our analogy about a game involving tossing a ring while aiming for a peg
- The tossed ring represents our credible interval, and the peg represents our population parameter
- Credible intervals are similar to the ring before it has been thrown at the peg
- There is a % chance that the ring will land around the peg
Final Notes about Confidence and Credible Intervals
- Confidence intervals and credible intervals arrive at the same answer, but use different approaches
- Confidence intervals essentially measure the standard error of some population parameter by sampling confidence intervals
- Credible intervals essentially measure the standard error of some population parameter by looking at the range (or interval) after taking 95% of the data from the sampling distribution
- Although probabilities from frequentist inference is based on long-run frequencies, probabilities from bayesian inference is based on long-run frequencies as well
- The difference comes from a different way of representing uncertainty in parameter estimates, which comes from the inclusion of priors in bayesian inference
- Therefore, probabilities within bayesian and frequentist inference should eventually converge to the same estimates if the prior is uninformative within the example of bayesian inference
References
Previous
Next