Motivating Assumptions
- Previously, we learned how to estimate with
- In turn, we learned how to estimate causal effects
-
We learned that makes some assumptions about
- We must verify there isn't any selection bias or other biases
- Let's summarize those assumptions now and introduce a few more
Verifying for Independent Assignment
- Assigning an observation to a treatment and control group shouldn't be made based on their potential outcomes or
- Another way of saying this is that potential outcomes do not depend on the particular group assignment; they are independent
- In other words, treatment and control assignment must be independent of any potential outcomes
-
Examples of violations of the independence assumption include:
- A doctor assigning certain patients to a treatment group who he/she thinks will react more positively compared to the patients he/she assigns to the control group
- These assumptions must hold in order to make accurate estimations about causal effects
Verifying SUTVA Assumptions
-
There are two similar assumptions coined as SUTVA assumptions:
- Observations are homogeneous between the control and treatment groups
- Spillover (or externalities) don't exist between observations
-
Examples of violations of the homogeneity assumption include:
- Doctors applying surgery in the control group are more skilled or higher quality compared to the treatment group
- The IQ of one group is higher than the other group
-
Examples of violations of the spillover assumption include:
- Students assigned to attend a tutoring program to improve their grades might interact with other students in their school who were not assigned to the tutoring program and influence the grades of these control students
- Social media users in a control group may influence users in a treatment group
- These assumptions must hold in order to make accurate estimations about causal effects
References
Previous
Next